Why a 30-Day Chief of Staff Plan Beats a 90-Day One
The 90-Day Plan Is Bullsh*t. Here’s Why 30 Days Is Enough.
Forget waiting three months to make an impact. By the time a classic 90-day plan finishes its “grand assessment,” the business has already shifted. Leaders and teams don’t need more theory or pretty decks—they need traction now.
The first 30 days aren’t about perfection. They’re about momentum. That comes from two things:
Trust – showing up with presence, asking sharp questions, and proving you care about how change feels.
Visible value – delivering quick wins and a simple, directional roadmap that leadership can actually use.
Change agents who listen deeply, communicate often, and spot low-hanging fruit don’t just “onboard.” They prove their worth in real time.
If you’re hiring for impact, expect traction in a month—not a quarter. If you’re stepping into a new role, this is your playbook: meet, map, validate, communicate, and deliver clarity fast.
That’s how you create momentum that lasts.
Why Every Organization Needs a Chief of Staff Who Speaks Tech and Business
A Chief of Staff with tech fluency bridges the gap between business and technology. They ensure systems connect, data serves strategy, and teams adopt tools that stick. By translating between leaders and technologists, they turn complexity into clarity, align AI responsibly, and keep momentum steady so technology drives real business value.
Chief of Staff vs Project Manager
Chief of Staff vs. Project Manager
The terms often get blurred, but the roles are distinct.